Teresa Coelho, M viagra online .D., David Adams, M.D., Ph.D., Ana Silva, M.D., Pierre Lozeron, M.D., Philip N. Hawkins, Ph.D., F.Med.Sci., Timothy Mant, M.B., Javier Perez, M.D., Joseph Chiesa, M.D., Steve Warrington, M.D., Elizabeth Tranter, M.B., Malathy Munisamy, M.D., Rick Falzone, M.P.H., Jamie Harrop, B.A., Jeffrey Cehelsky, M.B.A., Brian R. Bettencourt, Ph.D., Mary Geissler, M.P.H., James S. Butler, Ph.D., Alfica Sehgal, Ph.D., Rachel E. Meyers, Ph.D., Qingmin Chen, Ph.D., Todd Borland, B.S., Renta M. Hutabarat, Ph.D., Valerie A. Clausen, Ph.D., Rene Alvarez, Ph.D., Kevin Fitzgerald, Ph.D., Christina Gamba-Vitalo, Ph.D., Saraswathy V.
When all manuscripts dealt with by these editors were examined, a complete of 32 content articles were identified that had been accepted because of the comments of fake reviewers. It really is unclear what motivated the guest editors to engage in such fraud, nor has it been determined whether the authors of the manuscripts included participated in the deception in any way. There are several lessons to be learned from these instances of peer-reviewer and peer-review fraud. One is definitely that the digital manuscript-handling systems that a lot of journals make use of are as vulnerable to exploitation and hacking as additional data systems.